Ensemble Ensemble
Menu
Home
  • SOLUTIONS
  • Method
    • A Systemic Approach
    • Theory of Constraints
    • Working with us
  • RESOURCES
    • Productivity Scorecard
    • Articles
    • Subscribe
    • Our book
  • Results
  • ABOUT
    • The Just Work Manifesto
    • Our Story
    • Location
Book a call
loader

Language | People | Process

View all articles SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER to get articles and more

STAY CONNECTED AND SIGNUP TO RECEIVE INSIGHT updates

Subscribe

Springboard: The One Thing

David Hodes, Founder

The latest in our series that uses the ‘book review’ format as a springboard into a wider conversation about the world of work—and how to do it better.

The ONE Thing, Gary Keller with Jay Papasan
____________________________

In my last article, I quoted from the movie City Slickers in reference to how leaders should focus on what they need to do to make a transformative difference to their organisations. In some ways, that was a preview of forthcoming attractions. In this piece, I highlight some pragmatic and inspiring points from a book that will help you focus on what cowboy Curly was pointing to.

The ONE Thing (cover)

It took me some time to take up a friend’s recommendation to read The ONE Thing. Here was a book written by a hero of the real-estate market of all things, it was a best seller, and I already knew everything there was to know about focus. After all, wasn’t that the main claim of my speciality, the Theory of Constraints? And then I reminded myself of the chutzpa of Dr Eli Goldratt, who famously said he wasn’t interested in Pareto and his 80/20. He was always on the lookout for the 99/1.

Once I got over my own hubris and picked up the book, I couldn’t put it down. It’s written in a very accessible and engaging style, filled with illuminating quotes and relevant explanatory diagrams. What a treasure trove of practical wisdom the book turned out to be. Just ask the question, every day:

‘What’s the one thing you can do, such that by doing it, everything else will be easier or unnecessary?’

There are many practical tips and stories around how to achieve extraordinary results by becoming a ‘one-trick pony’, acquiring a ‘one-track mind’ and being ‘single-minded’. All this counterintuitive advice is there to help you go after what really matters and to shed the rest. I loved that they could write about the fact that when in pursuit of the one thing, everything else could get pretty messy and out of order. I also liked the way they punctured the illusion that you can have a work-life balance if you’re in pursuit of anything truly remarkable:

‘The reason we shouldn’t pursue balance is that magic never happens in the middle; magic happens at the extremes.’

It’s never balanced if you’re going to achieve great results, but they do introduce the idea of counterbalance:

‘Whatever you’re doing, be fully present. This is the secret of counter-balance: bringing our full attention to the effort at hand.’

One of the central ideas of the book is the ‘domino effect’, which the authors use to illustrate that if a chain reaction was started where every successive domino was half as big again as the one preceding it, then by the 57th iteration, what started at the size of a single domino could reach the distance to the moon. It’s harnessing this power of geometric progression that lies at the heart of the power of the one thing. Focus on what you really want and love and start with a mindset that sees you knocking over the next thing—not the ultimate prize, but just the next thing—metaphorically half as big again as the one that preceded it. And like the dominos, you’ll soon be playing in the big leagues.

There’s no such thing as a balanced life if you are going to achieve greatness.

So, what sits between you and this simple-to-understand pathway to success? Well, Keller reckons there are six lies between you and success:

1. Everything matters equally
The antidote to this is to get serious about Pareto and keep going on your to-do list until there is only the one thing left—a high leverage activity that makes all the other things on your list either go away or become much easier.

2. Multitasking
The executive function of our brains is very small relative to the rest. If you listen to your monkey mind and switch in and out of different activities, there is a huge transactional cost. Compare how much you get done when working in flow to when you are continuously interrupted.

3. A disciplined life
It’s not that we need to be disciplined across all things all the time. What we need to do is to take the 66 days required to turn a discipline into a habit so that doing the right thing becomes second nature.

4. Willpower is always on will-call
Willpower is a finite resource and should be conserved to do those things which really matter, and not spread too thin. Be aware of how much energy you have and understand that low energy correlates with low will power. So, do what matters most first thing every day, when your willpower is strongest.

5. A balanced life
There’s no such thing as a balanced life if you are going to achieve greatness. There will be times when, in pursuit of your one thing, you will forego all attention to anything else. The remedy for this is to understand the idea of counterbalance. When you inevitably have to go too far one way for a period, you must counterbalance it at other times to ensure you lead the good and fulfilling life.

6. Big is bad
Thinking that ‘thinking big’ is bad, is a bad thought. Do not be encumbered by the limiting nature of your goal, but rather set a big one and figure out what you need to do to get there. In doing so, you get to achieve your lesser goal on the way through to the bigger one. Be crazy enough to think you can change the world, as everyone who ever did was similarly crazy. Have the courage to take on your fears and use the experience of others who have made the breakthroughs as your guide. Don’t fear failure; by definition, you can’t be learning if you’re not failing.

In the section which talks about the art of a powerful question, there is a wonderful poem:

My Wage
By JB Rittenhouse

I bargained with Life for a penny,
And Life would pay no more,
However I begged at evening
When I counted my scanty store.

For Life is a just employer,
He gives you what you ask,
But once you have set the wages,
Why, you must bear the task.

I worked for a menial’s hire,
Only to learn dismayed,
That any wage I had asked of Life,
Life would have willingly paid.

More than half of a good answer is a powerful question, and it’s worth repeating the question that gives the book its title:

‘What’s the ONE thing I can do, such that by doing it, everything else will be easier or unnecessary.’

The question is posed in two parts—the big picture and the small focus. The big picture provides you with a vision worthy of your fleeting life, whilst the small focus gets you to pay attention to that one domino which starts the fall of all others. By helping you develop the powerful question through a series of concepts and exercises, Keller shows how the concept can be applied to the whole of an accomplished life, be it business, finances, family, physical health, spirituality or any other aspect of a life well lived. How to make it a habit of mind, practiced every day—full of possibility, benchmarked and routinely monitored.

In the third section of the book, he talks of extraordinary results and the relationship between productivity and purpose. I was reminded of Nietzsche’s famous dictum that if you had a powerful enough ‘why’ you could bear almost any ‘what’. Purpose informs priority, and focusing on priority delivers the productivity required to achieve your goal. And that goal, as described by the authors, is like one of those Russian dolls. It has multiple horizons to it, from the ‘someday goal’ (what’s the ONE thing I want to do some day?) through the five-year goal, the one-year goal, the monthly goal, the weekly goal, the daily goal and the right now goal: ‘Based on my daily goal, what’s the one thing I can do right now to achieve my daily goal?’ And so on back up the ladder of time.

I found the section of the book dealing with ‘time blocking’ especially useful. It just seems logical, the author’s claim, that:

‘If disproportionate results come from one activity, then you must give that one activity disproportionate time.’

How often, after all, do we ask ourselves the question as to the opportunity cost of the use of that irreplaceable and finite resource we all have, called time? What doesn’t get done in accordance with your goal if you spend time doing things which don’t advance you towards its attainment?

Toward the end of the book, Keller stopped me in my tracks with a small section called ‘Move from E to P’. The context was a piece about mastery, in which he defined the concept of mastery as:

‘The path to mastering something is the combination of not only doing the best you can do it, but also doing it the best it can be done.’

The ‘E’ referred to above is the path of the entrepreneur, which Keller argues has a ceiling of achievement and goes through four predictable phases once that ceiling is hit: disappointment, resignation, the search for greener pastures and then the repetition of that cycle. ‘P’ stands for the purposeful approach which calls on you to do what comes ‘unnaturally’. Only then can you break through the natural ceiling of accomplishment through a positive repeating cycle of focus, models, systems and breakthroughs. You can see it in the serial failed entrepreneur versus the business leader who hunkers down and learns to break through. I liken the ‘E’ and ‘P’ approach to Carol Dweck’s insights into what behaviours lead to the development of a ‘fixed’ or ‘growth’ mindset (see my review of Mindset).

Along with the six lies mentioned above, Keller talks of the four thieves of productivity:

1. The inability to say ‘No’
2. Fear of chaos
3. Poor health habits
4. Environment doesn’t support your goals

For each of these thieves, Keller has some very practical ideas as to how to start saying ‘no’, accept chaos, manage your energy and take ownership of your environment. Keller’s optimism and enthusiasm throughout are truly inspiring. As I read, I could feel myself being drawn in by his generosity and wisdom. This, I thought, is a book written by a man who lives fully in the mindset of abundance.

And, just in case you think it’s all about work, in the part on time blocking about how to organise your time to give you the opportunity to focus on the one thing, I loved the fact that they start by asking you to plan your annual calendar by considering first when and where you’re going to take your vacation. That was the first entry in my diary once I completed the book.

____________________________

What’s next?

The change from standard thinking to Theory of Constraints (TOC) is both profound and exhilarating. To make it both fun and memorable, we use a business simulation we call The Right Stuff Workshop.

We’d love to run it with you. To learn more:

  • download the brochure (no email required)
  • schedule a call

    ____________________________


    [Background photo by Natalia Y on Unsplash]

    “There is nothing as useless as doing efficiently
    that which should not be done at all.”—Peter Drucker

    ____________________________

  • Culture
  • Operations
  • Process
  • Strategy

The healthcare professional: the hidden constraint in patient flow

Ensemble Administrator

Healthcare professionals are central to the patient’s progress from awareness of a therapy to successful long-term use. They identify risk, interpret evidence, diagnose conditions, discuss options, perform procedures, provide training and monitor outcomes.

Yet many medical device development programs treat healthcare professionals primarily as users to be trained or customers to be persuaded.

HCP-Centered Design takes a wider view. It examines the work healthcare professionals must perform, the system in which they perform it and the constraints that limit their ability to move suitable patients through the care pathway.

“If patient flow depends on a healthcare professional, that professional’s available capacity may determine how many patients ultimately receive the therapy.”

Healthcare professionals govern critical transitions

A medical device patient journey commonly depends on several healthcare professionals:

  • A primary care professional recognizes a problem or makes a referral.
  • A specialist assesses the patient and manages the disease pathway.
  • Diagnostic professionals generate and interpret evidence.
  • A managing physician supports authorization or reimbursement.
  • An interventional specialist confirms eligibility and performs a procedure.
  • Nurses, educators or allied health professionals help the patient adapt.
  • Follow-up teams monitor efficacy and coordinate adjustments.

Each professional governs a transition in the flow of patients.

If one transition lacks sufficient capacity, information or clarity, the whole pathway slows. More marketing, sales activity or production capacity will not compensate for a shortage of specialist time or a burdensome diagnostic process.

This is why HCP-Centered Design is not simply about making an interface easier to use. It is about enabling the system of care to perform.

The HCP works within a system

A healthcare professional’s work depends on information and actions supplied by others. They may rely on referrals, patient histories, pathology, imaging, electronic records, clinical guidelines and the availability of equipment or trained colleagues.

After reaching a decision, they may need to explain it, document it, arrange authorization, coordinate treatment and prepare the next person in the pathway.

A technically strong solution can still create difficulty if it:

  • Requires information that is hard to obtain
  • Interrupts established clinical workflows
  • Produces outputs that are difficult to interpret
  • Adds documentation without removing other work
  • Fails to connect with existing systems
  • Demands training that cannot be sustained
  • Transfers work or risk to another professional
  • Provides a result without clarifying the next action

The relevant design question is not merely, “Can the HCP use this product?”

It is, “Does this solution improve the HCP’s ability to complete important clinical work within the conditions in which care is actually delivered?”

Identify the real healthcare professional personas

“HCP” is not one persona.

A general practitioner, specialist, interventional physician, nurse, technician and clinical administrator encounter different stages of the pathway. Each has different responsibilities, authority, expertise and exposure to risk.

Even within a profession, context matters. An experienced specialist in a major hospital may approach the same task differently from a professional who encounters the condition infrequently or works without immediate specialist support.

Useful HCP personas distinguish factors that influence work:

  • Clinical responsibility and decision authority
  • Frequency of encountering the condition
  • Experience with the procedure or technology
  • Access to information and specialist support
  • Available time
  • Confidence in interpreting results
  • Responsibility for follow-up
  • Exposure to clinical, legal or financial risk

These personas clarify who performs each job and what support each person requires.

Map the HCP journey

The HCP journey often begins before the visible clinical procedure.

It may include receiving a referral, gathering information, forming an initial view, ordering investigations, interpreting results, deciding whether the patient is eligible, discussing treatment, obtaining authorization, preparing for the procedure, delivering care and arranging follow-up.

At each stage, ask:

  • What is the HCP trying to accomplish?
  • What information is required?
  • Where does the information come from?
  • What decision must be made?
  • What could cause delay or rework?
  • Who depends on this action?
  • What must happen before the patient can progress?

The resulting journey map should distinguish processing time from waiting time. A decision may require only minutes of specialist attention while patients wait weeks to access that attention.

This reveals the practical relationship between HCP capacity and patient flow.

Find the HCP constraint

The Theory of Constraints directs attention to the factor limiting the performance of the entire system.

In some pathways, the constraint may be the number of qualified interventional specialists. In others, it may be diagnostic capacity, physician confidence, authorization effort, operating room access or the time required to train patients.

The constraint may also be hidden inside the HCP’s working day.

A specialist supporting a therapy must still manage other clinical duties, administration, meetings, documentation and urgent cases. The question is not simply how many specialists exist. It is how much of their usable capacity is available for the activities upon which patient flow depends.

“The scarcest resource may not be the healthcare professional. It may be the few hours of focused capacity available for the critical work.”

Improvement away from this constraint can make performance worse. Sending more referrals to an already overloaded specialist increases the queue. Adding information may increase cognitive burden. Creating another approval may consume the capacity required to treat patients.

HCP-Centered Design seeks to protect and expand the capacity that governs flow.

Go to the clinical Gemba

Policies and procedures describe how clinical work should happen. Observation reveals how it actually happens.

Healthcare professionals routinely compensate for missing information, awkward interfaces and unreliable handovers. These workarounds may become so familiar that nobody reports them as problems.

Gemba research should examine:

  • How the HCP prepares
  • Which tools and information sources are used
  • What interrupts the work
  • Where the HCP waits or repeats activity
  • How uncertainty is communicated
  • What must be documented
  • How work passes to the next person
  • How the HCP recognizes that the job is complete

The purpose is not to judge the healthcare professional. It is to understand the system surrounding the work.

“A workaround is often evidence that the system has failed to support the person doing the work.”

Define the HCP’s job to be done

Healthcare professionals do not simply use devices. They use them to make progress in clinical work.

An HCP may need to identify risk, reach a confident diagnosis, select an intervention, perform a procedure safely, explain options, monitor progress or recognize deterioration.

A structured job map divides this work into eight stages:

  1. Define the intended clinical outcome.
  2. Locate the necessary information and resources.
  3. Prepare the patient, equipment and environment.
  4. Confirm readiness and choose between alternatives.
  5. Execute the clinical activity.
  6. Monitor its progress and results.
  7. Modify the approach when circumstances change.
  8. Conclude, document and prepare for subsequent care.

This wider view prevents the product team from concentrating exclusively on the procedure.

The greatest value may come from reducing preparation, improving decision confidence, clarifying an exception, simplifying documentation or improving the handover to follow-up care.

Convert experience into measurable outcomes

Comments such as “the interface is difficult” or “we need better information” indicate dissatisfaction, but do not provide sufficient direction for design.

They should be translated into measurable outcome statements, such as:

“Minimize the time required to identify which clinical information is missing before making a treatment decision.”

Or:

“Reduce the likelihood that a clinically significant change goes unrecognized between scheduled reviews.”

A broader population of healthcare professionals can then assess the importance of each outcome and their satisfaction with their current ability to achieve it.

Highly important and poorly satisfied outcomes provide a rational basis for prioritizing innovation.

“Adoption follows when a solution makes important clinical work safer, clearer or easier to complete.”

Apply FOCUS to HCP capacity

The five-step FOCUS process creates a practical improvement cycle.

Find the constraint. Determine which HCP activity or resource currently limits patient flow.

Optimise for it. Protect the constraint from avoidable work, missing information, interruptions and rework.

Collaborate around it. Align upstream and downstream teams so patients, information and resources arrive when required.

Uplift it. Add capacity, redesign responsibilities, improve technology or remove restrictive policies.

Start Again. Identify the new constraint once flow improves.

This approach allows the organization to distinguish activity from value. It also turns HCP engagement into an ongoing management discipline.

Connect HCP evidence with enterprise execution

HCP-Centered Design must connect clinical reality with patient needs, technology, regulation and business strategy.

A Value Management Office can help coordinate these perspectives across the product lifecycle. Its role is to ensure that projects, resources and stage-gate decisions remain connected to patient flow and business value.

The organization should be able to show:

  • Which HCP groups influence the pathway
  • What each group is trying to accomplish
  • How the work happens in practice
  • Which outcomes remain poorly served
  • Where HCP capacity constrains patient flow
  • How the proposed solution changes the wider care system
  • How improvement will be measured

The goal is not simply a device that healthcare professionals can operate. It is a solution they can confidently incorporate into care and a delivery system capable of getting that solution to more patients.


What’s next?

Use the HCP-Centered Design assessment to determine how well your organization understands clinical work, HCP capacity and the constraints governing patient flow.

The resulting evidence should guide product design, process improvement and investment toward better products, delivered faster, with more lives changed for good.

READ MORE

  • Operations
  • People
  • Process
  • Strategy

Patient flow: the missing system in Patient Centered Design

Ensemble Administrator

Medical device companies devote enormous skill and investment to developing safe, effective products. Yet a technically successful device changes no lives while suitable patients remain unable to reach it.

Between a patient becoming aware of a therapy and receiving its intended benefit lies a pathway of referrals, consultations, diagnostics, approvals, procedures, training and follow-up. Every step consumes time. Between the steps, patients wait. At some points, they become confused, discouraged, ineligible or lost to the process.

Patient Centered Design must therefore address more than the design of the device. It must improve the performance of the entire system through which patients reach, receive and live successfully with the solution.

“A life-changing therapy changes no lives while patients remain trapped in the pathway leading to it.”

The patient journey is a flow system

A typical medical device journey may include:

  1. The patient becomes aware of a possible therapy.
  2. A primary care professional or specialist assesses the patient.
  3. Diagnostic work determines whether the therapy is appropriate.
  4. The patient secures authorization or reimbursement.
  5. An interventional specialist confirms and plans the procedure.
  6. The patient receives the device or therapy.
  7. The patient learns how to live with the solution.
  8. Follow-up identifies any necessary adjustments.
  9. Periodic reviews monitor longer-term efficacy.

Companies often manage these stages as separate functions. Marketing works on awareness. Medical affairs supports clinicians. Market access addresses reimbursement. Sales works with specialists. Clinical teams gather evidence. Training teams support adoption.

The patient, however, experiences one journey.

From the patient’s perspective, a delay between two organizational functions remains a delay. A repeated test remains repeated work. An unclear handover creates uncertainty regardless of which department owns it.

Patient Centered Design begins when the organization sees and manages this journey as a connected system.

Processing time tells only part of the story

Every step contains some necessary processing time. A consultation takes time. A diagnostic test takes time. An authorization must be assessed. A procedure must be performed.

The patient’s total lead time, however, also includes the waiting between these activities.

A consultation may take 30 minutes, but the patient could wait six weeks for it. A diagnostic test may take an hour, followed by another delay before a specialist reviews the result. Prior authorization may require little actual work while adding weeks to the pathway.

This distinction matters because organizations often improve processing time while leaving the larger queues untouched. Saving five minutes during an appointment produces little benefit if the patient waits months to reach it.

Patient Centered Design therefore asks:

  • How long does each activity take?
  • How long do patients wait between activities?
  • How many suitable patients enter each stage?
  • How many progress to the next stage?
  • Where and why do patients leave the pathway?
  • How much total time passes before the patient receives the solution?

The answers reveal the true performance of the patient system.

Find the constraint

Theory of Constraints teaches that the performance of any system is limited by a constraint. Improving a part of the system that is not constraining flow may create more activity without increasing results.

If diagnostic capacity is the constraint, generating more awareness may simply produce a longer queue for diagnosis. If specialist capacity is the constraint, accelerating authorization may move patients more quickly into another wait. If training after first use is inadequate, increasing procedures may produce poor experiences and avoidable follow-up demand.

“More activity at a non-constraint creates work in process. More capability at the constraint improves the system.”

The constraint is not always a physical resource. It may be a policy, an eligibility rule, missing evidence, a fragmented handover, an information delay or the cognitive burden placed on the patient.

The most important question is therefore not, “How do we improve every step?”

It is, “What currently limits the flow of suitable patients to successful use of the therapy?”

Understand why patients remain in or leave the flow

Numbers show where patients are lost. Patient research helps explain why.

Two patients with the same diagnosis may respond very differently. One may actively seek new treatment options. Another may delay action until symptoms become severe. A third may want help but lack confidence in navigating the healthcare system.

Meaningful patient segmentation considers characteristics that influence behavior:

  • The importance the person gives their health
  • Their confidence in dealing with healthcare professionals
  • Whether they act independently or need encouragement
  • Their comfort with technology
  • The pressures of work, family and daily life
  • Their ability to understand and act on clinical information
  • Their willingness and ability to pay
  • The outcomes they most want to achieve

These differences affect whether patients enter the pathway, remain engaged and successfully adopt the solution.

Go to the patient’s Gemba

The Gemba is the place where work actually happens. For patients, this includes the home, clinic, hospital and all the places where they manage their condition between formal encounters.

Interviews alone may miss important evidence. People normalize inconvenience, forget workarounds and simplify their past decisions. Observation allows the development team to see what patients actually do.

Good research combines three activities.

Observe. Watch how patients obtain information, prepare, use the solution and respond when something goes wrong.

Immerse. Understand the physical, emotional and practical conditions surrounding the experience.

Engage. Ask open questions that allow patients to describe their goals, fears and frustrations in their own language.

The purpose is to discover the patient’s reality before asking them to evaluate the organization’s preferred answer.

Understand the patient’s job to be done

Patients rarely want a medical device for its own sake. They want the progress it may enable.

They may want to recognize deterioration earlier, preserve independence, reduce pain, avoid repeated visits, return to work or prevent a disease from controlling daily life.

A useful job map examines eight recurring stages:

  1. Define what must be achieved.
  2. Locate the required information and resources.
  3. Prepare for the activity.
  4. Confirm readiness and choose between alternatives.
  5. Execute the activity.
  6. Monitor whether it is working.
  7. Modify the approach when circumstances change.
  8. Conclude or prepare for what follows.

This reveals opportunities beyond the immediate use of the device. The most valuable improvement may involve helping patients prepare, confirm readiness, recognize an exception or understand what happens next.

Turn patient experiences into evidence

Stories create understanding, but investment decisions require structured evidence.

Patient observations and comments should be converted into outcome statements that identify:

  • The desired direction of improvement
  • A measure of success
  • The object being controlled
  • The circumstances in which it matters

For example:

“Minimize the time required to recognize that my condition has changed sufficiently to require clinical help.”

Patients can then assess the importance of each outcome and their satisfaction with their current ability to achieve it.

Highly important and poorly satisfied outcomes represent genuine opportunities. This prevents teams from prioritizing attractive features that do not materially improve the patient’s life or progress through the pathway.

“Innovation becomes valuable when it improves an outcome that matters and remains poorly served.”

Apply the five-step FOCUS process

The Patient Centered Design pathway can be improved through a repeating discipline:

Find the constraint. Identify what currently limits patient flow or successful use.

Optimise for it. Make the best possible use of existing constraint capacity.

Collaborate around it. Align functions and partners so their actions support the constraint.

Uplift it. Add capability, remove restrictive policies or redesign the pathway.

Start Again. Once the constraint moves, identify and address the next limiting factor.

This prevents improvement from becoming a collection of disconnected initiatives. It directs scarce resources toward the factor that most strongly governs the result.

Patient Centered Design is an operating system

Patient insight should influence more than early product design. It should shape clinical evidence, regulatory strategy, reimbursement, manufacturing, education, market development and post-market support.

The organization should be able to show:

  • Which patients it intends to serve
  • What those patients are trying to accomplish
  • How the complete patient pathway operates
  • Where patients wait or leave the flow
  • Which outcomes remain poorly served
  • What currently constrains successful patient access
  • How the proposed solution improves the whole system

The goal is not simply to place the patient at the center of a diagram. It is to organize the enterprise around delivering better products faster, so that more lives can be changed for good.


What’s next?

Use the Patient Centered Design assessment to determine how well your organization understands its patient journeys, priority outcomes and constraints to patient flow.

The result should be more than another collection of patient opinions. It should provide evidence that directs strategy, investment and execution toward the changes that matter most.

READ MORE

More than just work

Discover better ways to do better work.

Fresh insights, every Friday

We alternate our own actionable articles with three relevant links from other authorities.

We’ll only use your email address for this newsletter. No sales calls

    Subscribe to 'Perspectives'

    [recaptcha id:cf7note]

    More Than Just Work
    Weekly productivity insights

    Subscribe
    • EnsembleConsultingGroup
    • Share Page
    • +61 2 9387 3955
    • info@EnsembleConsultingGroup.com

    Site proudly designed by Brand Fibre

    What is to get in touch with you?



    More than just work

    Discover better ways to do better work.

    Fresh insights, every Friday

    We alternate our own actionable articles with three relevant links from other authorities.


    We’ll only use your email address for this newsletter. No sales calls

    white_arrow white_bidirection_arrow arrow-right-green arrow-right-orange arrow-right arrow-left blue_arrow blue_round_arrow tick

    Want us to get in touch with you?

     
    Thank you for your interest. We will call you back.